District of Columbia· 5/30/2017
Panarello v. Salazar
Citations
- 254 F. Supp. 3d 85
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting that events over the course of two years, involving different decisionmakers, with a common theme of retaliatory denial of career advancement, would satisfy the Morgan test
- treating the defendant’s combined motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment as a motion for summary judgment “to the extent necessary”
- finding hostile work environment claim unexhausted where plaintiff identified only a few discrete acts of alleged discrimination and retaliation
- dismissing Title VII discrimination claims for failure to exhaust because the claims arose more than forty-five days before the complainant initiated contact with an EEO Counselor
- dismissing Title VII discrimination claims for failure to exhaust because the claims arose more than forty-five days before the complainant initiated contact with an EEO Counselor
- describing the “common themes” of denying the plaintiff “opportunities to advance her career”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Randolph D. Moss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Deppner v. Spectrum Health Care Res., Inc.D.C. Circuit· 2018-09-11· cited 27×
- Stephens v. MnuchinD.C. Circuit· 2018-07-17· cited 2×
- Stephens v. MnuchinDistrict of Columbia· 2018-07-17
- Deppner v. Spectrum Health Care Resources, Inc.District of Columbia· 2018-09-11
- Duffy v. JonesDistrict of Columbia· 2020-03-21
- Tumblin v. Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2020-12-03
- Panarello v. BernhardtDistrict of Columbia· 2021-01-11
- Yaich v. ScaliaDistrict of Columbia· 2022-08-05
- Wright v. SessionsDistrict of Columbia· 2022-12-12
- Reeve v. Monex Inc.District of Columbia· 2024-07-29
- Phelan v. MayorkasDistrict of Columbia· 2025-09-25
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court· 2007-04-30· cited 13,305×
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-11-09· cited 8,430×
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court· 2002-06-10· cited 6,600×
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court· 1986-06-19· cited 5,248×
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court· 2013-06-24· cited 3,582×
- Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at ArmsD.C. Circuit· 2008-03-28· cited 1,336×
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyD.C. Circuit· 1987-03-17· cited 1,192×
- Staub v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court· 2011-03-01· cited 1,083×
- Jones v. BernankeD.C. Circuit· 2009-03-06· cited 725×
- Roy E. Bowden v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1997-02-18· cited 590×
- Soon Y. Park v. Howard UniversityD.C. Circuit· 1996-02-12· cited 558×
- Smith-Haynie, J. C. v. Davis, AddisonD.C. Circuit· 1998-09-22· cited 417×
- Talavera v. ShahD.C. Circuit· 2011-03-29· cited 333×
- Baird v. GotbaumD.C. Circuit· 2011-12-13· cited 308×
- Adeyemi v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2008-05-16· cited 298×
- James E. Brown v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the ArmyD.C. Circuit· 1985-11-15· cited 288×
- Winston & Strawn, LLP v. James P. McLean, Jr.D.C. Circuit· 2016-12-09· cited 279×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.