Palombi v. Palombi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court properly declined to hold oral argument where the parties failed to submit case information statements as Rule 5:5-4(a) required
• holding that the court properly declined to hold oral argument where the parties failed to submit case information statements as Rule 5:5-4(a) required
• recognizing reconsideration \is not appropriate merely because a litigant is dissatisfied with a decision of the court or wishes to reargue a motion\
• finding that facts known to the party prior to entry of an original order did not provide an appropriate basis for reconsideration
• finding that a motion for reconsideration \is not appropriate merely because a litigant is dissatisfied with a decision of the court or wishes to reargue a motion\
• finding that a motion for reconsideration \is not appropriate merely because a litigant is dissatisfied with a decision of the court or wishes to reargue a motion . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).