New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 7/8/2010

Palombi v. Palombi

Citations

997 A.2d 1139
414 N.J. Super. 274

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the court properly declined to hold oral argument where the parties failed to submit case information statements as Rule 5:5-4(a) required
holding that the court properly declined to hold oral argument where the parties failed to submit case information statements as Rule 5:5-4(a) required
recognizing reconsideration \is not appropriate merely because a litigant is dissatisfied with a decision of the court or wishes to reargue a motion\
finding that facts known to the party prior to entry of an original order did not provide an appropriate basis for reconsideration
finding that a motion for reconsideration \is not appropriate merely because a litigant is dissatisfied with a decision of the court or wishes to reargue a motion\
finding that a motion for reconsideration \is not appropriate merely because a litigant is dissatisfied with a decision of the court or wishes to reargue a motion . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Axelrad, Sapp-Peterson and Espinosa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.