D'Atria v. D'Atria

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the court can consider new or additional information that the litigant couldn’t provide on the first application
• rejecting plaintiff's effort to bring a \document in under the guise of reconsideration\ that was available previously
• providing reconsideration is not permitted where new information could have been brought to the court's attention in the first application
• \It is not this Court's function . . . to displace the Bankruptcy Court in the fair administration of the assets of the debtor before it.\
• a motion for reconsideration must show that “(1) the Court has expressed its decision based upon a palpably incorrect or irrational basis, or (2) it is obvious that the Court either did not consider, or failed to appreciate the significance of probative, competent evidence.”
• a motion for reconsideration must show that “(1) the Court has expressed its decision based upon a palpably incorrect or irrational basis, or (2) it is obvious that the Court either did not consider, or failed to appreciate the significance of probative, competent evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).