Palazzo v. Alves

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• anti-SLAPP statutes ‘‘pit two sets of fundamental constitutional rights against each other: (1) defendants’ rights of free speech and petition and (2
• where facts of subsequent SLAAP suit were intertwined with earlier lawsuit for slander and libel, the SLAPP claim was should have been brought as a counterclaim
• anti-SLAPP statutes ‘‘ ‘pit two sets of fundamental constitutional rights against each other: (1) defendants’ rights of free speech and petition and (2) plaintiffs’ rights of access to the judicial system and rights to non-falsely maligned reputations’ ’’
• “[T]he doctrine of res judicata extinguishes a party’s claims even if that party is ‘prepared in a second action to present evidence or grounds or theories of the case not presented * * * in the first action, or to seek remedies or forms of relief not demanded in that action.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).