In Re Brooklyn M.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, because mother, a party, made the contested statements, the statements were admissible as nonhearsay under Rule 801(d)(2)
• “Once DCYF has demonstrated parental unfitness * * * the Family Court then shifts its analysis to consider the best interests of the child or children involved in the proceeding. * * * At that juncture, the best interests of the child or children outweigh all other considerations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).