Palanque v. Lambert-Woolley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the fact [that] plaintiff had an expert report in her possession before filing suit does not satisfy the statute.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mayfield v. COMMUNITY MED. ASSOC., PA
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-11-28· cited 52×
• In Re Cendant Corp. Securities Litigation
  D. New Jersey· 2001-04-16· cited 20×
• Stoecker v. Echevarria
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2009-08-04· cited 17×
• Balthazar v. Atlantic City Medical Center
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-03-05· cited 16×
• Davies v. Imbesi
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-02-23· cited 13×
• Watts v. Camaligan
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-10-24· cited 10×
• Ricra v. Barbera
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-03-01· cited 9×
• Hefferon v. Gitler
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-12-21· cited 3×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Alan J. Cornblatt, PA v. Barow
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1998-03-19· cited 272×
• Hartsfield v. Fantini
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-06-27· cited 71×
• Zamft v. Cornell
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-04-07· cited 39×
• Barreiro v. Morais
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-02-23· cited 30×
• Wallace v. JFK Hartwyck at Oak Tree, Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-06-27· cited 27×
• Burns v. Belafsky
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-12-20· cited 22×
• Levinson v. D'Alfonso & Stein
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-04-15· cited 17×
• Janelli v. Keeper
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-06-05· cited 5×