Wallace v. JFK Hartwyck at Oak Tree, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that writing the wrong date on a calendar, causing the thirty-day period to be missed, did not qualify as an extraordinary circumstance warranting an extension for the attorney
• holding in both cases that an attorney's mistake \cannot give rise to extraordinary circumstances capable of relaxing the thirty-day\ limitations period for filing a demand for a trial de novo after arbitration
• finding that an \attorney's 'mere carelessness' or 'lack of proper diligence' is insufficient to relax the thirty-day deadline for filing a trial de novo under the 'extraordinary circumstances' exception\
• an attorney's mistake cannot give rise to extraordinary circumstances capable of relaxing the thirty-day limitations period for filing a demand for a trial de novo after arbitration
• in the context of late filings, attorney carelessness does not qualify as extraordinary circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).