Palafox v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing Texas transferred intent statute 23 and concluding that “[w]hen the only difference between what the actor desired or intended and the actual result is that a different offense was committed, the actor is responsible for causing the result that actually occurs”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Saucedo, Andrew Melchor
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2019-06-26· cited 112×
• State v. Higgins
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-07-29· cited 60×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wooldridge v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-07-20· cited 50×
• Hough v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1996-08-08· cited 18×
• Bagsby v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1986-12-03· cited 6×