· 12/19/1997
Pagel v. United States
Citations
- 986 F. Supp. 1315
- 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22248
- 1997 WL 795620
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying the reasoning of Adams to “reject[] the contention that 39 C.F.R. § 912.7(b) and 912.8 were duly promulgated to clarify or implement the requirements for claim presentation in 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a)”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Infante
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.