Skip to main content
· 4/12/1982

Mary E. Tucker v. United States Postal Service

Citations

  • 676 F.2d 954

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[t]his requisite minimal notice . . . promptly informs the relevant agency of the circumstances of the accident so that it may investigate the claim and respond either by settlement or by defense”
  • distinguishing statutory presentment requirement from regulations identifying evidence that agency may require when considering settlement
  • finding failure to exhaust on assault and battery claims because Plaintiffs administrative notice to the Agency failed to mention them
  • in tort claim against Postal Service, defining exhaustion requirement with reference to Postal Service regulations
  • in tort claim against Postal Service, defining exhaustion requirement with reference to Postal Service regulations
  • “The question whether a plaintiff has presented the requisite section 2675 notice is determined without reference to whether that plaintiff has complied with all settlement related requests for information.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibbons, Sloviter, Becker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.