Page v. Siedband

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e should avoid any interpretation that would lead to absurd or unreasonable outcome[s] . . . .”
• “[W]hen the plain language of a statute is unambiguous and does not lead to an absurd result, our inquiry begins and ends with the plain meaning of that language.” (quotation omitted)
• “Texas law establishes that the holder of a mineral estate has the right to exploit minerals, but does not own the subsurface mass.”
• “[W]e should avoid any interpretation that would lead to absurd or unreasonable outcome[s] . . . .”
• “[A]lthough a sense of Congress provision can, in some instances, provide valuable assistance in interpreting earlier legislation, such provisions are of limited legal effect.”
• “[T]he conveyance of mineral rights ownership does not convey the entirety of the subsurface.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).