Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Nebraska Supreme Court· 9/14/2001

Folgers Architects Ltd. v. Kerns

Citations

  • 633 N.W.2d 114
  • 262 Neb. 530
  • 2001 Neb. LEXIS 148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that during pendency of appeal, both parties filed motions relating to supersedeas deposits made by appellant
  • stating that during pendency of appeal, both parties filed motions relating to supersedeas deposits made by appellant
  • citing, with approval, cases holding that anti-assignment provisions prohibiting assignment of a contract do not affect the assignability of a claim for breach of contract
  • this court upon granting further review may consider assignments of error Court of Appeals did not reach
  • “When an unambiguous contract exists that covers the issue for which damages are sought, promissory estoppel is not a viable theory of recovery.”
  • “[T]he intent of the provision against assignment of rights under a contract, which generally is to allow the parties to choose with whom they contract, is not affected by allowing an assignment of a right to collect damages for breach of contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hendry, Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack, Miller-Lerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Folgers Architects Ltd. v. Kerns

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.