Padova v. Padova

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that parties are bound by contract “[i]n the absence of evidence of fraud or unconscionable advantage taken at the time of execution” (emphasis added)
• “In the absence of evidence of fraud or unconscionable advantage taken at the time of execution, the parties themselves are bound according to the terms of the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wells v. Village of Orleans, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1974-02-05· cited 50×
• Hill v. Grandey
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1974-06-04· cited 44×
• Lafko v. Lafko
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1969-06-19· cited 25×
• Grimes v. Grimes
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1992-11-06· cited 21×
• Strong v. Strong
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1962-11-07· cited 7×
• Rogers v. Rogers
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1977-02-01· cited 7×
• Scribner v. State Highway Board
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1975-02-04· cited 1×
• Danielle Lacroix v. Peter Rysz
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2025-04-04· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Howard v. Howard
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1960-09-06· cited 16×