Hill v. Grandey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• for res judicata purposes claims are same if same evidence will support action in both instances
• insured is under no “obligation to respond” to insurance agent’s attempts to gain facts that may be relevant to additional available coverage
• agent was told only to obtain coverage provided to previous owner and had no reason to know of off-premises barbecue business which had never been included under coverage before
• “An agent may point out to [an insured] the advantages of additional coverage and may ferret out additional facts from the insured applicable to such coverage, but he is under no obligation to do so; nor is the insured under an obligation to respond.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Jones v. Grewe
  California Court of Appeal· 1987-02-24· cited 93×
• In Re Central Vermont Public Service Corporation
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2001-02-09· cited 64×
• Faulkner v. Caledonia County Fair Ass'n
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2004-12-17· cited 55×
• American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Conway
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-08-25· cited 43×
• State v. Dann
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1997-08-08· cited 41×
• Rocque v. Co-Op. Fire Ins. Ass'n of Vt.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1981-11-03· cited 32×
• Berisha v. Hardy
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1984-02-03· cited 32×
• Booska v. Hubbard Insurance Agency, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-03-12· cited 32×
• Nowell v. Dawn-Leavitt Agency, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-08-12· cited 30×
• Southwest Auto Painting & Body Repair, Inc. v. Binsfeld
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-06-02· cited 24×
• Delozier v. State
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-04-30· cited 21×
• Lerman v. Lerman
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-04-30· cited 20×
• Slansky v. Slansky
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-09-30· cited 19×
• In Re Moulton
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1992-06-26· cited 19×
• Davis v. Saab-Scania of America, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1975-04-01· cited 17×
• Town of Waterford v. Pike Industries, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1977-04-05· cited 17×
• Stokes v. Harrell
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1986-06-02· cited 15×
• Carlson v. Clark
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2009-02-13· cited 14×
• In Re Estate of Leno
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1981-06-02· cited 14×
• Orleans Village v. Union Mutual Fire Insurance Co.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1975-02-14· cited 12×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Consolidated Sun Ray, Inc. v. Lea
  Third Circuit· 1968-09-16· cited 28×
• Trapeni v. Walker
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1958-09-02· cited 26×
• B & E CORPORATION v. Bessery
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1972-12-05· cited 16×
• LANE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. State
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1970-04-07· cited 13×
• Dodge v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1969-02-04· cited 13×
• Padova v. Padova
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1962-07-16· cited 12×
• Utilities Construction Corp. v. Peerless Insurance
  D. Vermont· 1964-07-01· cited 11×
• McKee v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1956-05-01· cited 8×
• Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. Shuford & McKinnon, Inc.
  S.D. Mississippi· 1968-08-30· cited 6×
• Abajian v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company
  D. Vermont· 1964-05-01· cited 4×