Padilla v. AT & T CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding case where defendant failed to meet its burden to establish that “Plaintiff could not amend her pleadings and ultimately recover” against the defendant
• finding fraudulent joinder where the plaintiff could plead additional facts to support her existing claims against the supervisor brought in the operative pleading
• “Remand must be granted unless the defendant shows that the plaintiff would not be afforded leave to amend his complaint to cure the purported deficiency.”
• “Remand must be granted unless the defendant shows that the plaintiff would not be afforded leave to amend his complaint to cure the purported deficiency.”
• remand must be granted unless defendant demonstrates plaintiff would not 9 | be given permission to amend his FEHA claims
• ‘a defendant seeking removal based on an alleged fraudulent joinder must do more than show that the complaint...fails to state a claim against the non-diverse defendant.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).