Paciulan v. George

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is “rational for the State Bar to limit 'pro hac vice admission to non-residents to prevent California residents from using pro hac vice to circumvent this state’s stringent bar membership requirements”
• noting that defendants, who were the Justices of the California Supreme Court, explained that the pro hoc vice rule “extends comity to out-of-state attorneys for occasional appearances in the courts of this state in order to accommodate residents who desire such counsel”
• rejecting plaintiffs’ claim that California’s rule on admission pro hac vice violated their right of access to the court
• imposing pre-filing order against Giannini

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).