P. David Bailey v. Allgas, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “market share at or less than 50% is inadequate as a matter of law to constitute monopoly power”
• finding that plaintiffs expert testimony, which failed to consider alternative products in defining relevant market, was insufficient as a matter of law
• “Because demand is difficult to establish with accuracy, evidence of a seller’s market share may provide the most convenient circumstantial measure of monopoly power.”
• “[E]vi-dence of a seller’s market share may provide the most convenient circumstantial measure of monopoly power.”
• “Entry barriers include ... capital outlays required to start a new business----”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).