Johnson v. Board of Regents of the University of Georgia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a plaintiff cannot serve as a class representative if she lacks standing to advance the class’s claim”
• reasoning that “we accord district courts broad discretion over the management of pre-trial activities, including discovery and scheduling”
• assuming that educational diversity is a compelling interest, but holding that the school’s admissions policy was not narrowly tailored
• reasoning that “we accord district courts broad discretion over the management of pre-trial activities, including discovery and scheduling”
• noting that the Eleventh Circuit “accord[s] district courts broad discretion over the management of pre-trial activities, including discovery and scheduling”
• noting that the Eleventh Circuit “accord[s] district courts broad discretion over the management of pre-trial activities, including discovery and scheduling”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).