Skip to main content
· 7/27/2009

Ovalles v. Holder

Citations

  • 577 F.3d 288
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 16494
  • 2009 WL 2222883

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that Ovalles “concededly did not 2 Case: 17-60438 Document: 00515696726 Page: 3 Date Filed: 01/06/2021 No. 17-60438 request reopening with[in] the specified allowed time even as calculated from the time the law changed”
  • describing the underlying IJ and Board decisions in more detail
  • “Thus, because sections 1229a(c)(6) and 1229a(c)(7
  • applying § 1003.2(d) concerning BIA reopening

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garwood, Owen, Haynes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.