Otto Halpern v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Totten \primarily turned on the breach of contract which the Court found occurred by the very bringing of the action\
• allowing in camera trial by inventor of secret invention against the government so long as state secrets not divulged
• describing the availability of an in camera trial as an option when the government invoked the state secrets privilege
• reversing dismissal of complaint under the Invention Secrecy Act, 35 U.S.C. §§ 181-188 (1976
• reversing dismissal of complaint under the Invention Secrecy Act, 35 U.S.C. §§ 181-188 (1976
• “The disclosure of the manufactured cryptographic systems potentially puts at risk nearly every national secret over the last 30 years.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).