Skip to main content

Ostrov v. I.F.T., Inc.

Citations

  • 586 A.2d 409
  • 402 Pa. Super. 87
  • 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 203

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the first count of the complaint specifically requested an injunction and corollary relief in the form of damages
  • “matters involving the general reasonableness or adequacy of a utility’s service to the public are within the primary jurisdiction of the [PUC].”
  • action did not come within the primary jurisdiction of PUC since plaintiff did not contend that medical examination provision of self-insurance plan violated the PUC’s rules or regulations governing self-insurance motor carriers nor any other PUC rule or regulation for self insurance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Beck, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.