Ostler v. Codman Research Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying House’s request for an extension because “[w]hile a two-day extension arguably would not frustrate management’s ability to make capital decisions with certainty, a delay of years could have a significant impact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• The First Marblehead Corp. v. Gregory House
  First Circuit· 2006-12-22· cited 38×
• Mariasch v. Gillette Co.
  First Circuit· 2008-03-27· cited 23×
• Wert v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2004-11-17· cited 2×
• First Marblehead Corp. v. House
  D. Massachusetts· 2005-11-18

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ruiz-Troche v. Pepsi Cola of Puerto Rico Bottling Co.
  First Circuit· 1998-12-01· cited 366×
• Cavalier Oil Corp. v. Harnett
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1989-09-05· cited 154×
• Michelson v. Duncan
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1979-10-02· cited 142×
• David B. Fite v. Digital Equipment Corporation
  First Circuit· 2000-11-13· cited 116×
• Great Lakes Aircraft Co. v. City of Claremont
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-03-09· cited 94×
• United States v. Shea
  First Circuit· 1998-11-04· cited 59×
• Play Time, Inc. v. LDDS Metromedia Communications, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1997-08-12· cited 53×
• Concrete Constructors, Inc. v. Harry Shapiro & Sons, Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1981-10-07· cited 7×
• Hilco Property Services, Inc. v. United States
  D. New Hampshire· 1996-06-03· cited 7×