Osteen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that district courts utilize proximate cause analysis in resolving whether a restitution award is a direct or indirect cause of a criminal offense
• restitution statute precludes an award of lost business income incurred while renovating and restoring business premises after a burglary and theft
• restitution may not be awarded for loss of business expenses where the measure of damages is speculative and difficult to prove

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Schuette v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-06-20· cited 32×
• Montalvo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-04· cited 7×
• Elmer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-06-20· cited 5×
• Stocks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-01-31· cited 4×
• Garay v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-20· cited 2×
• Mastrantoni v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-11

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-02-25· cited 87×
• Cliburn v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-08-11· cited 16×
• Arling v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-18· cited 12×
• Garrison v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-12-27· cited 10×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-13· cited 10×
• Ahnen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-08-10· cited 7×
• Hodge v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-08-12· cited 7×
• Self v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-11-16· cited 3×