District Court of Appeal of Florida· 8/12/1992
Hodge v. State
Citations
- 603 So. 2d 1329
- 1992 WL 191311
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting notion that damages must be reasonably foreseeable or that the element of causation should be likened to the proximate causation requirement in tort, because this would be more restrictive than the \clear language\ of section 775.089(1)(a)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Owen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Glaubius v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-02-20· cited 94×
- Schuette v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-06-20· cited 32×
- Osteen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-23· cited 6×
- Mayer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-02-25· cited 4×
- Glaubius v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-05· cited 2×
- Starcher v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-12-02
- Weisman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-10-18
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.