Skip to main content

Osburn v. State

Citations

  • 44 P.3d 523
  • 118 Nev. 323
  • 118 Nev. Adv. Rep. 32
  • 2002 Nev. LEXIS 43

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the police use of an electronic mobile tracking device does not infringe a reasonable expectation of privacy
  • recognizing that evidence obtained as a consequence of lawless official acts is excluded as fruit of the poisonous tree
  • concluding that appellant did not have 16 a reasonable expectation of privacy in the exterior of a vehicle he had parked in plain view of the street
  • ruling that attaching GPS to bumper of car was not an unreasonable search
  • following Mclver and holding that the police use of a mobile tracking device does not infringe a reasonable expectation of privacy
  • following McIver and holding that the police use of a mobile tracking device does not infringe a reason- able expectation of privacy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agosti, Rose, Young, Maupin, Shearing, Leavitt, Becker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.