Osborne v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Reviewing courts should review a[n] [R. & R.] for clear error where objections are ‘merely -5- perfunctory responses,’ argued in an attempt to ‘engage the district court in a rehashing of the same arguments set forth in the original petition.’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• United States v. Williams
  D. Vermont· 2019-04-04· cited 1×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miller-El v. Cockrell
  Supreme Court· 2003-02-25· cited 27,550×
• Coppedge v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 20,800×
• Williams v. Taylor
  Supreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 15,929×
• United States v. Wade
  Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
• Neil v. Biggers
  Supreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
• Manson v. Brathwaite
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
• Miller-El v. Dretke
  Supreme Court· 2005-06-13· cited 1,931×
• Camardo v. General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Plan
  W.D. New York· 1992-06-19· cited 368×
• Martin H. Tankleff v. D.A. Senkowski, Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility
  Second Circuit· 1998-01-12· cited 359×
• United States v. Alex Wong, Roger Kwok, Chen I. Chung, Tung Tran, Danny Ngo, Brian Chan, Joseph Wang, Chiang T. Cheng, and Steven Ng
  Second Circuit· 1994-11-08· cited 230×
• Greene v. WCI Holdings Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1997-02-27· cited 139×
• David Dickerson v. Walter Fogg
  Second Circuit· 1982-10-25· cited 40×
• Nicholas Mysholowsky v. People of the State of New York
  Second Circuit· 1976-05-06· cited 25×
• Ortiz v. Artuz
  E.D. New York· 2000-09-08· cited 11×
• Brown v. Tracy
  E.D. New York· 2004-01-14· cited 1×