Osborn v. Osborn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Rule 59(e) motion allows trial court to revise initial judgment if necessary to relieve party of unjust operation of record resulting from mistake of court
• explaining that Rule 59(e) motion allows trial court to revise initial judgment if necessary to relieve party of unjust operation of record resulting from mistake of court
• requiring the trial court to consider husband’s undistributed share of his mother’s estate in formulating appropriate property settlement, as “[ujnder 15 V.S.A. § 751 the trial court was required to settle the rights of the parties to all of their property”
• a motion under V.R.C.P. 59(e),-which codifies trial court’s inherent power to modify a judgment, suspends the finality of the judgment
• Rule 59(e) motion suspends finality of judgment, allowing trial court to revise initial judgment if necessary
• Rule 59(e) motion to amend gives court occasion to relieve party of unjust operation of the record resulting from court’s mistake or inadvertence, but not from party’s own fault or neglect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Drumheller v. Drumheller
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2009-03-06· cited 49×
• Northern Security Insurance Co. v. Mitec Electronics, Ltd.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2008-08-01· cited 49×
• Cleverly v. Cleverly
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-04-14· cited 42×
• In re SP Land Co., LLC, Act 250 LUP Amendment
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2011-09-22· cited 40×
• Murray v. St. Michael's College
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1995-09-08· cited 40×
• Nevitt v. Nevitt
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-11-30· cited 38×
• DeLeonardis v. Page
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2010-06-04· cited 32×
• Chilkott v. Chilkott
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1992-03-20· cited 31×
• Lewis v. Cohen
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1991-12-13· cited 27×
• Burton v. Jeremiah Beach Parker Restoration & Construction Management Corp.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2010-06-21· cited 25×
• Naumann v. Kurz
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-08-25· cited 20×
• Hayden v. Hayden
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2003-10-10· cited 18×
• In re Application of Beach Properties, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2015-10-16· cited 8×
• Osborn v. Osborn
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1992-07-10· cited 6×
• Camisa v. Camisa
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1998-05-08· cited 3×
• Paquette v. Paquette
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-10-02· cited 1×
• In re Application of Beach Properties, Inc. d/b/a Basin Harbor Club, for a Certificate of Public Good for an Interconnected Group Net-Metered Photovoltaic Electric Power System
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2015-10-16
• Gerlach Area Parking Permit
  Vermont Superior Court· 2010-02-18
• South Village Communities, LLC
  Vermont Superior Court· 2006-09-14
• Simpson Developoment Corp.
  Vermont Superior Court· 2006-09-07