Ortiz v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the probationer’s misstatement about the time he left work in his explanation to his probation officer about why he was late did not demonstrate that the probationer was unfit for probation and was not a substantial violation
• reinstating probation because the violation “did not demonstrate that [the probationer] was unfit for probation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Filmore v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-03-12· cited 6×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-02· cited 2×
• Cruz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-01-18· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Benedict v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-01-05· cited 5×
• ANDL v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-11-07· cited 1×