Ortega v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding application of successor statute regarding registration of sexual predator was regulatory and not an ex post facto violation
• \[C]ourts have almost universally recognized that the registration provisions in sexual predator statutes are regulatory....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Giorgetti
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-03-04· cited 55×
• Westerheide v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-09-29· cited 54×
• Kelly v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-17· cited 18×
• Burgos v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-09-06· cited 7×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-10-07

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McKibben v. Mallory
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1974-03-20· cited 78×
• Collie v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-01· cited 70×
• Fletcher v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-26· cited 37×