Skip to main content

Opticare Acquisition Corp. v. Castillo

Citations

  • 25 A.D.3d 238
  • 806 N.Y.S.2d 84

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding exercise of personal jurisdiction against nonresident former employees under § 302(a)(2
  • nexus requirement satisfied, in plaintiff’s contract and misappropriation action, where contracts were executed and other business activities were transacted in New York
  • “Simply put, the appellants could not conduct any business for Wise, in New York or elsewhere, without the confidential information they allegedly misappropriated.”
  • nexus requirement satisfied, in plaintiff's contract and misappropriation action, where contracts were executed and other business activities were transacted in New York
  • defendants’ “access via computer to data . . . maintained in New York” supported a finding of personal jurisdiction
  • “Mani festly, [due process concerns regarding minimum contacts are] not present where, as here, a defendant has purposefully directed its activities toward the forum, and has created continuing obligations between itself and forum residents”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.