Omar v. Allstate Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an insurer relying on the limitation authorized in section 627.727(9) has the burden of proving its compliance with the notice provisions
• discussing the insurer's burden to demonstrate informed election to benefit from presumption
• discussing insurer's burden to demonstrate informed election to benefit from presumption
• implicitly approving an identical policy exclusion, but reversing a summary judgment due to an absence of proof that the insured knowingly accepted limited coverage
• Mullis does not permit exclusions based on the fact that a class I insured is injured while occupying a motor vehicle that was not insured by the uninsured motorist insurer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).