Reid v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a vehicle cannot be both insured and uninsured under the same policy
• stating that this outcome “would completely nullify the family-household exclusion”
• stating that this outcome \would completely nullify the family-household exclusion\
• applying principle with no indication that claimant received benefits under another policy
• applying principle with no indication that claimant received benefits under another policy
• but cf. Jernigan v. Progressive America Ins. Co., 501 So.2d 748 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App.) (distinguishing Reid ), rev. denied, 513 So.2d 1062 (Fla. 1987)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).