Ogles v. EA Mann & Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that the acceptance doctrine applied since there was no evidence that the work was nonconforming or imminently dangerous at the time it was completed and accepted by the employer
• affirming dismissal when “[plaintiffs] own expert testified that DOT’s design met generally accepted design or engineering standards”
• “a road contractor cannot be held responsible for completed work over which it no longer exercises any control”
• discussing general rule of road contractor liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).