Johnson v. E. A. Mann & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over a claim filed under the GTCA when the ante-litem notice failed to comply with OCGA § 50-21-26 (a) (5) (A)’s requirement that it state the entity that the plaintiff intended to hold liable
• summary judgment to road contractor was not appropriate where there was evidence that the accident occurred before the DOT accepted the road work
• ante litem notice failed to name any state entity that plaintiff sought to hold responsible for his injuries as required by OCGA § 50-21-26 (a)
• ante litem notice failed to name any state entity that plaintiff sought to hold responsible for his injuries as required by OCGA § 50-21-26 (a)
• trial court erred in denying dismissal of complaint when plaintiff failed to strictly comply with ante-litem-notice requirements
• trial court erred in denying dismissal of complaint when plaintiff failed to strictly comply with ante-litemnotice requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).