Ochoa v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• cataloging limited evidence before jury and concluding such evidence “does not create the prejudicial effect Lambert sought to avoid”
• “[T]he record shows Ochoa’s decision to appear before the jury in jail dress was his own. He was compelled by no one but himself.”
• “[T]he record shows Ochoa’s decision to appear before the jury in jail dress was his own. He was compelled by no one but himself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ochoa v. Sirmons
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-04-09· cited 53×
• MITCHELL v. STATE
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2016-10-07· cited 47×
• Ochoa v. Workman
  Tenth Circuit· 2012-01-18· cited 43×
• State v. Finley
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2007-01-02· cited 14×
• Turman v. Safeway Stores, Inc.
  Montana Supreme Court· 1957-11-04· cited 11×
• Hooks v. Workman
  W.D. Oklahoma· 2010-02-26· cited 2×
• BRAMLETT v. STATE
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2018-05-31
• ALEXANDER v. STATE
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2019-09-05