Ochoa v. Housing Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because we affirm the district court’s dismissal of Appellants’ substantive 22 RICO claims for failure to state a claim, we also affirm the district court’s dismissal of 23 Appellants’ RICO conspiracy claims.”
• affirming dismissal of municipal defendants 10 without leave to amend
• affirming dismissal of municipal defendants 21 without leave to amend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Synergy Financial, L.L.C. v. Zarro
  W.D. North Carolina· 2004-07-12· cited 4×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
• Hughes v. Rowe
  Supreme Court· 1980-11-10· cited 3,527×
• Ernest J. Franceschi, Jr., Esq. v. Kenneth Schwartz, Commissioner of South Orange County Municipal Court
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-06-14· cited 218×
• Victor J. Polich v. Burlington Northern, Inc. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Delaware Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-08-26· cited 115×
• Barber v. Miller
  Ninth Circuit· 1998-06-12· cited 109×
• Chang v. Chen
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-04-04· cited 77×
• Pedrina v. Chun
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-10-10· cited 39×
• Neibel v. Trans World Assurance Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-03-11· cited 38×