Ninth Circuit· 6/12/1998
Barber v. Miller
Citations
- 146 F.3d 707
- 40 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1245
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4489
- 47 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1055
- 98 Daily Journal DAR 6192
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 12516
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[a]n award of [Rule 11] sanctions cannot be upheld” where party seeking sanctions did not provide twenty-one day notice period
- holding that “[a]n award of [Rule 15 11] sanctions cannot be upheld” where party seeking sanctions did not provide twenty-one 16 day notice period
- holding that actual service is required; an “informal warning” is insufficient
- noting that failure to comply with the safe 18 harbor provision precludes an award of Rule 11 sanctions
- noting that bad faith in an analogous context requires more than mere negligence
- noting that bad faith in 27 an analogous context requires more than mere negligence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Pennie & Edmonds LLPSecond Circuit· 2003-03-14· cited 134×
- Hunter v. Earthgrains Co. BakeryFourth Circuit· 2002-01-30· cited 123×
- Roth v. GreenTenth Circuit· 2006-10-30· cited 120×
- Winterrowd v. American General Annuity InsuranceNinth Circuit· 2009-02-17· cited 110×
- Patelco Credit Union v. SahniNinth Circuit· 2001-08-27· cited 84×
- In Re PrattFifth Circuit· 2008-04-23· cited 76×
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Second Circuit· 2009-09-02· cited 75×
- Hutchinson (Godlove) v. PfeilTenth Circuit· 2000-04-04· cited 56×
- Penn, LLC v. Prosper Business Development Corp.Sixth Circuit· 2014-12-12· cited 46×
- Lawrence v. RICHMAN GROUP OF CT LLCSecond Circuit· 2010-09-16· cited 44×
- Shalaby v. Mansdorf (In Re Nakhuda)Ninth Circuit· 2016-02-04· cited 36×
- Sneller v. City of Bainbridge IslandNinth Circuit· 2010-05-25· cited 29×
- Farris v. County of CamdenD. New Jersey· 1999-08-20· cited 23×
- Polo Building Group, Inc. v. Rakita (In Re Shubov)Ninth Circuit· 2000-09-27· cited 22×
- Gottschalk v. City & County of San FranciscoN.D. California· 2013-08-12· cited 19×
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsNinth Circuit· 2000-11-07· cited 16×
- Radcliffe v. Rainbow Construction Co.Ninth Circuit· 2001-06-13· cited 14×
- Triantos v. Guaetta & Benson, LLCFirst Circuit· 2024-01-30· cited 13×
- Calop Business Systems, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesC.D. California· 2013-10-30· cited 12×
- Truesdell v. Southern California Permanente Medical GroupC.D. California· 2002-07-24· cited 11×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-08-02· cited 6,250×
- Stephen Michael Ridder v. City of Springfield, Clark CountySixth Circuit· 1997-03-14· cited 342×
- George Hadges, William M. Kunstler v. Yonkers Racing Corp.Second Circuit· 1995-03-02· cited 178×
- Barber v. MillerNinth Circuit· 1998-06-12· cited 134×
- Elliott v. TiltonFifth Circuit· 1995-09-15· cited 97×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.