Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 6/12/1998

Barber v. Miller

Citations

  • 146 F.3d 707
  • 40 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1245
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4489
  • 47 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1055
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 6192
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 12516

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[a]n award of [Rule 11] sanctions cannot be upheld” where party seeking sanctions did not provide twenty-one day notice period
  • holding that “[a]n award of [Rule 15 11] sanctions cannot be upheld” where party seeking sanctions did not provide twenty-one 16 day notice period
  • holding that actual service is required; an “informal warning” is insufficient
  • noting that failure to comply with the safe 18 harbor provision precludes an award of Rule 11 sanctions
  • noting that bad faith in an analogous context requires more than mere negligence
  • noting that bad faith in 27 an analogous context requires more than mere negligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.