Ocello v. White Marine, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that severe sanctions “advance[| the significant general deterrent effect that Rule 37 is intended to serve”
• district court abused its discretion by dismissing party’s cross-claims to sanction “counsel’s abusive litigation practices,” because the “sound practice” would have been to “impos[e] sanctions directly on [the] dilatory lawyers”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lodge v. UNITED HOMES, LLC
  E.D. New York· 2011-05-05· cited 11×
• In Re Sagecrest II, LLC
  D. Connecticut· 2011-01-14· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 2,202×
• McDermott, Inc. v. AmClyde
  Supreme Court· 1994-04-20· cited 322×
• United States v. Marion Seltzer, Esq., Vaughn Rosario, A/K/A Vaughn Michaels
  Second Circuit· 2000-09-25· cited 135×
• Thomas Dodson v. Marvin Runyon, Postmaster General for the U.S. Postal Service
  Second Circuit· 1996-06-12· cited 80×
• Salahuddin v. Harris
  Second Circuit· 1986-01-31· cited 70×

Other cases named Ocello v. White Marine, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Ocello v. White Marine, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2009-09-29