O'Callaghan v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, because “there [wa]s no requirement that the plaintiff prepare a pleading responsive to the defendant’s amended answer[,] . . . the plaintiff’s request for a more definite statement of the answer [wa]s wholly unwarranted and w[ould] be denied on that basis.”
• denying motion for a more definite statement of an answer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).