Angelo Fiataruolo, Angelo Veno v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing useful context from “simple bald assertion[s] of the law” and statements “designed to invade the province of the trial court”
• finding an ordinance overinclusive and not 9 narrowly tailored where there were “several obvious examples of prohibited 10 speech that [did] not cause the types of problems that motivated the 11 [o]rdinance” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Indeed, ‘courts have routinely enhanced the lodestar to reflect the risk of 9 non-payment in common fund cases.’”
• “Leave to amend should be granted unless the district court 9 determines that the pleading could not possibly be cured by the allegation of other facts.”
• A responsible party need not have \absolute authority\ or \the final word on which creditors are to be paid or how funds are to be allocated.\
• “The judgments on their face demonstrate that the court had fully adjudicated all the issues before it, leaving nothing remaining for it to do with respect to this litigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).