Skip to main content
· 4/13/1989

Obert v. Environmental Research & Development Corp.

Citations

  • 771 P.2d 340
  • 112 Wash. 2d 323

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \rule precluding consideration of issues not previously raised operates only at the discretion of this court\
  • “rule precluding consideration of issues not previously raised operates only at the discretion of this court”
  • no implied consent exists when an issue is raised for the first time after plaintiff has rested his case
  • majority of limited partners did not violate fiduciary duty by voting to replace general partner without holding a meeting or notifying general partner or remaining limited partners
  • “[RAP 12.1(b)] clearly allows a new issue to be raised by the appellate court.”
  • court raising applicability of statute sua sponte

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pearson, Callow, Utter, Brachtenbach, Dolliver, Dore, Andersen, Durham, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.