· 4/13/1989
Obert v. Environmental Research & Development Corp.
Citations
- 771 P.2d 340
- 112 Wash. 2d 323
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \rule precluding consideration of issues not previously raised operates only at the discretion of this court\
- “rule precluding consideration of issues not previously raised operates only at the discretion of this court”
- no implied consent exists when an issue is raised for the first time after plaintiff has rested his case
- majority of limited partners did not violate fiduciary duty by voting to replace general partner without holding a meeting or notifying general partner or remaining limited partners
- “[RAP 12.1(b)] clearly allows a new issue to be raised by the appellate court.”
- court raising applicability of statute sua sponte
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pearson, Callow, Utter, Brachtenbach, Dolliver, Dore, Andersen, Durham, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.