Washington Supreme Court· 4/13/1989
Obert v. Environmental Research & Development Corp.
Citations
- 771 P.2d 340
- 112 Wash. 2d 323
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \rule precluding consideration of issues not previously raised operates only at the discretion of this court\
- “rule precluding consideration of issues not previously raised operates only at the discretion of this court”
- no implied consent exists when an issue is raised for the first time after plaintiff has rested his case
- majority of limited partners did not violate fiduciary duty by voting to replace general partner without holding a meeting or notifying general partner or remaining limited partners
- “[RAP 12.1(b)] clearly allows a new issue to be raised by the appellate court.”
- court raising applicability of statute sua sponte
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pearson, Callow, Utter, Brachtenbach, Dolliver, Dore, Andersen, Durham, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. FordWashington Supreme Court· 1999-03-11· cited 399×
- Hanson v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court· 1993-05-27· cited 184×
- City of Seattle v. McCreadyWashington Supreme Court· 1994-02-24· cited 158×
- Harris v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 1993-01-21· cited 99×
- O'FLAHERTY v. BelgumCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-02-26· cited 74×
- Greengo v. Public Employees Mut. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1998-07-23· cited 56×
- Greengo v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court· 1998-07-23· cited 55×
- Wirum & Cash, Architects v. CashAlaska Supreme Court· 1992-05-22· cited 25×
- Port of Edmonds v. Northwest Fur Breeders Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-10-07· cited 18×
- State v. ValentineCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-09-01· cited 10×
- Diamond Parking, Inc. v. Frontier Building Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-12-30· cited 7×
- In Re Marriage of MaughanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-09· cited 7×
- Maughan v. MaughanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-09· cited 7×
- Woodfield Neighborhood Homeowner's Ass'n v. GrazianoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-11-09· cited 7×
- Williamson v. Kay (In Re Villa West Associates)D. Kansas· 1996-03-04· cited 4×
- Bank of the West v. BurlingameCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-05-24· cited 2×
- State of Washington v. Kelly Jay BallesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2024-09-27· cited 2×
- Dalton M, LLC v. North Cascade Trustee Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2022-02-17
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cogan v. Kidder, Mathews & Segner, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1982-07-22· cited 23×
- Bassan v. Investment Exchange Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1974-06-20· cited 22×
- Williams v. Queen Fisheries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1970-05-18· cited 18×
- Hutchinson v. Port of BentonWashington Supreme Court· 1963-06-27· cited 17×
- Grill v. Meydenbauer Bay Yacht ClubWashington Supreme Court· 1961-03-02· cited 7×
- Obert v. Environmental Research and Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1988-04-11· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.