Skip to main content
· 5/22/1992

Wirum & Cash, Architects v. Cash

Citations

  • 837 P.2d 692
  • 1992 Alas. LEXIS 52
  • 1992 WL 184009

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, because partner had entrusted his wife to manage partnership's financial records, wife also owed fiduciary duty to partnership
  • concluding that, because partner had entrusted his wife to manage partnership’s financial records, wife also owed fiduciary duty to partnership
  • remanding for superior court to \enter additional findings and conclusions as to whether [partner's] various breaches [of fiduciary duties] were material breaches of the parties' contract\ excusing other partner's performance
  • remanding for superior court to “enter additional findings and conclusions as to whether [partner’s] various breaches [of fiduciary duties] were material breaches of the parties’ contract” excusing other partner’s performance
  • in cases of management discretion and self-dealing, a higher standard of good faith, honesty, and fair dealing is applied
  • “Where a point is not given more than a cursory statement in the argument portion of a brief, the point will not be considered on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Compton, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.