Oberly v. Bangs Ambulance, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Only a total loss of use is compensable under the ‘permanent loss of use’ exception to the no-fault remedy.”
• “Had the Legislature considered partial losses already covered under ‘permanent loss of use,’ there would have been no need to enact the [second and third categories of serious injuries].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).