Skip to main content
· 4/17/2003

Davis v. Evan

Citations

  • 304 A.D.2d 1023
  • 758 N.Y.S.2d 203
  • 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Married Women’s Act of -8- J-A21012-14 1848 was not improperly retrospective because it did not “interfere with vested rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spain

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.