Oakes v. State
Citations
- 98 Miss. 80
- 54 So. 79
Syllabus
<p>1. Constitution 1890, § 13. Criminal libel. Province of court and jury. Evidence. Privileged commumcalions.</p> <p>Under Constitution 1890, § 13, providing that in prosecutions for libel, the jury may determine the law and the facts under the direction of the court, it is proper for the court to instruct that all the law to be considered by the jury in reaching a verdict is contained in its instructions and to refuse to permit counsel to read law books to the jury.</p> <p>2. Privileged Communications. Good motive.</p> <p>A communication imputing the commission of a criminal offense or of moral delinquency to a public officer, even in. the discharge of his official duties, is not privileged, and the only excuse for so doing is that the same is true and in addition that the same was published from “good motive and for justifiable ends.” If the communication is in fact untrue, the motive with which it is published' is wholly immaterial.</p> <p>•3. Same.</p> <p>Where the defense is that the matter charged to be libelous is true, the defendant should be allowed to testify that the publication was made with good motives and for justifiable ends.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a verdict as to liability reflects a mixed question of law and fact
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ex Parte TucciTexas Supreme Court· 1993-06-30· cited 133×
- Lisa Learmonth v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Fifth Circuit· 2013-02-27· cited 55×
- Dworkin v. L.F.P., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court· 1992-09-18· cited 36×
- State v. WhitesideSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1961-03-21· cited 32×
- Albert Miller & Co. v. CorteFifth Circuit· 1939-11-24· cited 22×
- State v. SefritWashington Supreme Court· 1914-12-12· cited 10×
- Smith v. ByrdMississippi Supreme Court· 1955-11-07· cited 7×
- Bentall v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1919-12-16· cited 6×
- Boydstun v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1971-06-07· cited 5×
- Lisa Learmonth v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Fifth Circuit· 2013-03-22
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1895-01-21· cited 757×
- Moschell v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1892-03-15· cited 35×
- Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1874-07-15· cited 19×
- Ayers v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1883-04-15· cited 16×
- Drake v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1890-11-15· cited 15×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1870-06-15· cited 13×
- State v. SyphrettSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1887-06-23· cited 13×
- Harris v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 1881-09-15· cited 12×
- Bangs v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1883-10-15· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.