Tennessee Supreme Court· 9/15/1881
Harris v. State
Citations
- 75 Tenn. 538
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Plainly the theory involves the absurdity, that an error of the judge may be revised, yet an error of the jury as to the law, which may be fatal to the prisoner, can never be[.]”
- “At common law, the jury only maintained the right and responsibility to act under the instructions of the court and apply the law given to them to the facts proven with the mission of determining guilt.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feeeman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BlackTennessee Supreme Court· 1991-08-05· cited 445×
- STATE of Tennessee v. Phedrek T. DAVISTennessee Supreme Court· 2008-10-17· cited 86×
- State v. BaneTennessee Supreme Court· 1993-03-29· cited 62×
- State of Tennessee v. Nickolus L. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court· 2013-04-19· cited 41×
- Dworkin v. L.F.P., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court· 1992-09-18· cited 36×
- Oakes v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1910-03-15· cited 21×
- State of Tennessee v. Curtis Logan LawsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2019-10-08
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.