S.D. New York· 12/12/1997
Nycal Corp. v. INOCO PLC
Citations
- 988 F. Supp. 296
- 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19851
- 1997 WL 774683
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that “the only testimonial evidence presented by either party that is properly considered is the testimony . . . concerning objective expressions of the parties’ intent made during the negotiations”
- rejecting testimony concerning contracts negotiations where witness did not have personal knowledge of the negotiations
- Lacey and Rowland deposition testimony deemed to be sworn, based on personal knowledge, and set forth facts admissible in evidence
- “[S]ummary judgment is appropriate in a contract interpretation dispute whenever there is no genuine issue of fact . . . .”
- testimony reflecting subjective intent or understanding only is not properly considered in construing ambiguous language in an agreement
- “[W]hen resolving disputes concerning the meaning of ambiguous contract language, unexpressed subjective views have no proper bearing.” (collecting cases)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kaplan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Farrokh Yassan v. J.P. Morgan ChaseSeventh Circuit· 2013-02-28· cited 71×
- DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC. v. RhodesS.D. New York· 2008-09-29· cited 39×
- Gulf USA Corporation v. Federal Insurance CompanyNinth Circuit· 2001-08-07· cited 34×
- Ferguson v. Lion Holding, Inc.S.D. New York· 2007-03-01· cited 24×
- Development Specialists, Inc. v. Peabody Energy Corp.S.D. New York· 2013-01-30· cited 24×
- Faulkner v. National Geographic SocietyS.D. New York· 2006-09-18· cited 23×
- Buena Vista Home Entertainment, Inc. v. Wachovia Bank (In Re Musicland Holding Corp.)S.D. New York· 2007-08-24· cited 19×
- Kopel v. Campanile (In Re Kopel)E.D. New York· 1999-03-01· cited 19×
- Delta Mills, Inc. v. GMAC Commercial Finance LLC (In Re Delta Mills, Inc.)D. Delaware· 2009-03-17· cited 19×
- Malmsteen v. Universal Music Group, Inc.S.D. New York· 2013-04-19· cited 18×
- Consorcio Prodipe, S.A. De C v. v. Vinci, S.A.S.D. New York· 2008-03-12· cited 16×
- Space Imaging Europe, Ltd. v. Space Imaging L.P.S.D. New York· 1999-03-17· cited 15×
- MSF Holding Ltd. v. Fiduciary Trust Co. InternationalS.D. New York· 2006-06-20· cited 15×
- Shepley v. New Coleman Holdings Inc.Second Circuit· 1999-04-01· cited 13×
- Robbins International, Inc. v. Robbins MBW Corp. (In Re Robbins International, Inc.)S.D. New York· 2002-03-07· cited 12×
- Faulkner v. National Geographic SocietyS.D. New York· 2003-12-11· cited 12×
- First Montauk Securities Corp. v. MenterS.D. New York· 1998-11-17· cited 9×
- Lee v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc.S.D. New York· 2005-01-17· cited 7×
- Acushnet Company v. Beam, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-02-02· cited 7×
- RJE CORP. v. Northville Industries Corp.E.D. New York· 2002-04-25· cited 6×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanySecond Circuit· 1975-10-24· cited 1,021×
- Schering Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Home Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1983-06-21· cited 335×
- Mencher v. WeissNew York Court of Appeals· 1953-07-14· cited 189×
- Hotchkiss v. National City Bank of New YorkS.D. New York· 1911-12-30· cited 166×
- Walk-In Medical Centers, Inc. v. Breuer Capital Corp.Second Circuit· 1987-05-05· cited 164×
- Elizabeth A. Honce v. Jose A. Vigil, D/B/A Dorado Investments, Inc., A/K/A Villa Chaparral Mobile Home Sub-Division Dorado Investments, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1993-08-25· cited 162×
- William Rothenberg v. Lincoln Farm Camp, Inc.Second Circuit· 1985-02-25· cited 159×
- Unnamed caseSecond Circuit· 1985-03-18· cited 124×
- Burger King Corporation v. The Horn & Hardart CompanySecond Circuit· 1990-01-19· cited 116×
- Wards Company, Inc. v. Stamford Ridgeway Associates and Trim Fashions, Inc., Stamford Ridgeway AssociatesSecond Circuit· 1985-05-03· cited 113×
- Ernst v. Mechanics' & Metals Nat. Bank of New YorkSecond Circuit· 1912-12-09· cited 105×
- Wells v. Shearson Lehman/American Express, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1988-06-07· cited 103×
- Surlak v. SurlakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-09-12· cited 86×
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. United Bank Corporation Of New YorkSecond Circuit· 1994-08-09· cited 78×
- Hudson-Port Ewen Associates, L.P. v. KuoNew York Court of Appeals· 1991-07-09· cited 73×
- Paragon Resources, Inc. v. National Fuel Gas Distribution CorporationFifth Circuit· 1983-01-21· cited 56×
- Holt v. Alleghany Corp.Supreme Court· 1966-04-18· cited 51×
- Suzanne M. Hanson Peter C. Hanson v. McCaw Cellular Communications, Inc. McCaw Communications of Florida, Inc.Second Circuit· 1996-02-27· cited 51×
- Hudson-Port Ewen Associates, L.P. v. Chien KuoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1991-03-07· cited 48×
- Alleghany Corporation v. Allan P. Kirby, Charles T. Ireland, Jr., and Fred M. Kirby, Randolph PhillipsSecond Circuit· 1964-07-22· cited 47×
Other cases named Nycal Corp. v. INOCO PLC
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.