Skip to main content
· 7/31/2008

Nowell v. Rees

Citations

  • 199 P.3d 654
  • 219 Ariz. 399
  • 535 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 52
  • 2008 Ariz. App. LEXIS 119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • disagreeing with a trial court’s statutory interpretation that was “contrary to the plain meaning of the statutes”
  • declining to read an exclusion of time for restoration efforts of a criminal defendant into the applicable statutes or rules
  • finding that “the statutes mean what they say”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Irvine, Brown, Gemmill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.