· 7/31/2008
Nowell v. Rees
Citations
- 199 P.3d 654
- 219 Ariz. 399
- 535 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 52
- 2008 Ariz. App. LEXIS 119
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- disagreeing with a trial court’s statutory interpretation that was “contrary to the plain meaning of the statutes”
- declining to read an exclusion of time for restoration efforts of a criminal defendant into the applicable statutes or rules
- finding that “the statutes mean what they say”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Irvine, Brown, Gemmill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.