Skip to main content
· 4/13/1906

Notley v. Brown ex rel. Wise

Citations

  • 17 Haw. 455
  • 1906 Haw. LEXIS 64

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasons or bases are required for each of the BVA’s findings and conclusions on all material issues of fact and law on the record
  • “Whether the BVA’s ultimate conclusions are correct or not, ... the incomplete nature of the decision below does not permit proper review by this Court.”
  • “BVA’s decision must express findings with sufficient detail and clarity to achieve two critical purposes: to inform the claimant and to make meaningful review by this Court possible”
  • Court noted that BVA decision was issued prior to Court’s precedential decision in Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49 (1990), but remanded for BVA to comply with standards announced in Gilbert

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Erear, Hartamele, Hartwell, Wilder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.