Rubber Company v. Goodyear
Citations
- 73 U.S. 153
- 18 L. Ed. 762
- 6 Wall. 153
- 1867 U.S. LEXIS 951
Syllabus
<p>1. Though a decree have been entered “ os” of a prior date — the date of an order settling apparently the'terms of a decree to be entered thereafter— the rights of the parties in respect to an appeal are determined by the date of the actual entry, or of the signing and filing of the final decree.</p> <p>2. Tlio question of sufficiency of an appeal bond is to be determined in the first instance by the judge who signs the citation ; but after the allowance of the appeal it becomes cognizable here. It is not required that the security be in any fixed proportion to the amount of the decree; but only that it be sufficient. Where a decree had been for a large sum ($810,752), security in less than double the amount was accepted by this court, and the appellants allowed to withdraw a bond given in such double sum.</p>
Cited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court· 1952-12-22· cited 263×
- Scofield v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1969-04-01· cited 191×
- Kountze v. Omaha Hotel Co.Supreme Court· 1883-05-18· cited 126×
- Kitchen v. RandolphSupreme Court· 1876-10-30· cited 45×
- Richards v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1951-09-27· cited 37×
- In Re Hurley Mercantile Co.Fifth Circuit· 1932-03-11· cited 19×
- United States v. RayburnEighth Circuit· 1937-06-25· cited 17×
- The WashingtonSecond Circuit· 1926-12-06· cited 16×
- Martin v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1899-04-04· cited 16×
- In re McCallSixth Circuit· 1906-05-01· cited 16×
- United States v. San Geronimo Development Co.First Circuit· 1946-03-04· cited 14×
- Russia Cement Co. v. Le Page Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1899-10-19· cited 9×
- Harvey's Heirs v. WaitOregon Supreme Court· 1882-03-15· cited 8×
- Caskey v. PickettSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1981-05-18· cited 8×
- Morrin v. LawlerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York· 1899-01-28· cited 8×
- Hoiness v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1947-11-18· cited 6×
- Hathaway v. The Brantford CityS.D. New York· 1887-06-29· cited 6×
- Holiona v. KamaiHawaii Supreme Court· 1919-01-30· cited 4×
- Notley v. Brown ex rel. WiseHawaii Supreme Court· 1906-04-13· cited 3×
- Richardson v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court· 1890-10-09· cited 3×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.